Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-14 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 544.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is much better than the Galaxy C5, with an 89.6 score against 76.4. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Motorola edge has older 10 version and Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Motorola edge design is extremely newer than the Galaxy C5's, but it's thicker and notably heavier.
The Motorola edge counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola edge also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy C5 has a display that is just as good as the screen in Motorola edge, because although the Galaxy C5 has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Motorola edge features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy C5, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 192 GB more internal storage. Motorola edge has a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola edge features a way better camera than Galaxy C5, because it has a way higher video quality, a larger aperture and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.