Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a global score of 89.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 overall score. Motorola edge's construction is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, but it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Motorola edge has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola edge also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little bit better looking display than Motorola edge, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Motorola edge counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola edge features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 41 percent greater battery size. Motorola edge captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photography, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola edge also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos and a camera with a much better 64 MP resolution.
Motorola edge is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.