Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has a score of 89.6, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note10's 89 general score. Although Motorola edge is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note10, it must be noted that it's also somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little sharper display than Motorola edge, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater screen density.
Galaxy Note10 features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola edge, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note10 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Motorola edge shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola edge also counts with a back-facing camera with way more MP and a lot bigger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality.
The Motorola edge has a much bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note10, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal memory, the Motorola edge also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola edge has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola edge is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.