Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a bit better than the Motorola edge, getting a 93.4 score against 89.6. The Samsung Galaxy S22 body is newer, thinner and lighter than the Motorola edge. Both devices in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S22 has 13 version and Motorola edge has Android 10 version.
Galaxy S22 features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola edge, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 features a much sharper display than Motorola edge, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density.
Motorola edge counts with much more storage for apps and games than Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Motorola edge counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a bit better camera than Motorola edge, because although it has a back camera with way less mega-pixels, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola edge, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola edge. If you want to save some money, you can get Motorola edge, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.