Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is just a bit better than the Motorola edge, having a 95.4 score against 89.6. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Motorola edge has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is newer and a bit thinner, but heavier than the Motorola edge.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's processor is just as good as Motorola edge's processing unit, and although the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a greater amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better display than Motorola edge, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a little bit bigger screen and a greater pixel count per inch in the display.
Motorola edge counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Motorola edge, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola edge, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola edge, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola edge. If you want to save some money, you can get Motorola edge, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.