Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-14 | -- |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 6.63 ounces | -- |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola edge's 89.6 global score. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Motorola edge has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra design is a lot thinner and incredibly lighter than the Motorola edge.
The Motorola edge counts with a really superior performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better looking display than Motorola edge, because it has a bit bigger display, a greater display pixels density and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Motorola edge features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola edge also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Motorola edge, because it has a much better video resolution, a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light environments, a much more MP back facing camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola edge, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.