Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has a general score of 89.6, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. The Motorola edge body is a lot newer and a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, but it is a little heavier. The Motorola edge counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a sharper display than Motorola edge, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater display density. Motorola edge counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola edge features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Motorola edge features a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola edge also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Motorola edge is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.