Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-14 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a score of 89.6, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's general score of 78.1. Both devices in this comparison include Android operating system, but Motorola edge has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola edge's design is a lot newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge.
The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display. Motorola edge counts with much more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and 224 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola edge counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores. The Motorola edge counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh. The Motorola edge captures greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola edge also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
The Motorola edge costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S7 edge, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.