Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 544.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is much better than the Galaxy XCover 5, with a overall score of 89.6 against 78.1. Motorola edge's body is older, just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy XCover 5. These phones have Android operating system, but Motorola edge has older 10 version and Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11.
Motorola edge has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola edge also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola edge features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little bit better pixel count in each inch of screen and a bigger display.
The Motorola edge has a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola edge also has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back camera with much more mega pixels. The Motorola edge features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola edge features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.