Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is much better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having a score of 89.6 against 77.6. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola edge has 10 version while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version. The Motorola edge body is a bit thinner and much lighter than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, even though it was released 2 years before.
Motorola edge features an extremely better CPU than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Motorola edge counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger display.
The Motorola edge features a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Motorola edge has a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola edge shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola edge also has a camera with a lot higher resolution and a way bigger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.