Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 544.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has an overall score of 89.6, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Although Motorola edge and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released only 1 months apart, Motorola edge is noticeably lighter and a lot thinner. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Motorola edge has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a brighter screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little better performance than Motorola edge, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola edge counts with much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a battery life that's just as good as the Motorola edge one.
Motorola edge takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photos, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a much bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos.
Motorola edge not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.