Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has an overall score of 89.6, which is better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. Even when Motorola edge and the Galaxy XCover Pro were released only 3 months apart, Motorola edge is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola edge has 10 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a little more vivid display than Motorola edge, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola edge has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola edge has a little faster processor than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola edge also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola edge features a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures, a way better video quality and a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola edge features a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Motorola edge is more expensive than the Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.