Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 544.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has a score of 89.6, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 general score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola edge has older 10 version while Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Motorola edge construction is much thicker and a little bit heavier than Galaxy Z Flip.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola edge, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a little bit better screen density. Galaxy Z Flip has a bit faster CPU than Motorola edge, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola edge has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola edge also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
The Motorola edge has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola edge also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola edge has improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Motorola edge is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.