Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 544.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has an overall score of 89.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 general score. Both phones we are comparing here have Android operating system, but Motorola edge has the older 10 version and Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing here, Motorola edge's body is older, much thicker and a bit heavier than Galaxy Z Flip 3.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a bit better display than Motorola edge, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a bit higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a just a bit higher pixels count in each screen inch. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little faster CPU than Motorola edge, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola edge counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola edge has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Motorola edge has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola edge also has a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Motorola edge is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.