Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 544.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit better than the Motorola edge, with a general score of 92.3 against 89.6. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version and Motorola edge has Android 10 version. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is incredibly thinner and a little lighter than the Motorola edge, although both of them were only released with a few months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better screen than Motorola edge, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a just a bit higher screen density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola edge, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory.
Motorola edge features a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola edge also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Motorola edge has a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola edge also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola edge counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 36% more battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit more expensive than Motorola edge, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.