Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 544.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is just a bit better than Motorola edge's overall score of 89.6. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a more recent 11 version while Motorola edge has Android 10 version. Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is newer and much thinner, but also way heavier than Motorola edge.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little faster processing unit than Motorola edge, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 6 GB more RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Motorola edge have extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a just a little inferior pixel count in each display inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels.
The Motorola edge shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture. Motorola edge has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola edge also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola edge counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.