Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.2 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-11-01 | 2019-06-10 |
| 4.85 x 2.42 x 0.34 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 3.92 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Advanced | IPS LCD |
| 256 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 16.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 3.1 A has a global score of 64.8, which is a little bit better than the Motorola ELECTRIFY M's 59.2 score. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Nokia 3.1 A has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Motorola ELECTRIFY M has Android 4.1, so it offers a lot of extra features and performance improvements. The Nokia 3.1 A construction is notably newer than the Motorola ELECTRIFY M's, although it's a bit thicker and heavier.
The Motorola ELECTRIFY M counts with a slightly better screen than Nokia 3.1 A, although it has a much lower 960 x 540 resolution, a lot smaller screen and a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Nokia 3.1 A features a little bit better performance than Motorola ELECTRIFY M, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The Nokia 3.1 A counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Motorola ELECTRIFY M, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 128 GB and 32 GB internal storage. Nokia 3.1 A features a much better camera than Motorola ELECTRIFY M. Both of them have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the same video frame rates and a camera with an 8 mega-pixels resolution.
Nokia 3.1 A counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola ELECTRIFY M, because it has a 2990mAh battery size.
Nokia 3.1 A not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.