Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.438
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
--2007-08-15
3.80 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches4.06 x 2.04 x 0.45 inches
3.60 ounces3.35 ounces
$ 50.00$ 50.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2.3 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
128 pixels per inch174 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.56.1
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
35,84 MB internal memory102,4 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.40.6
Camera
2.00 MP3.00 MP
4.735.06
CDMACDMA
0.10.1
Battery Life
940mAh Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
395 hours standby time
5.5 hours talk time
192 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
2.482.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPSGPS

Comparison review

The Samsung Helio Fin has a general score of 38, which is better than Motorola Entice W766's 34.4 global score. Samsung Helio Fin's construction is notably thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola Entice W766. The Samsung Helio Fin features a better looking display than Motorola Entice W766, because it has a higher resolution of 320 x 240 pixels, a greater pixels density and a little bigger display.

The Samsung Helio Fin features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Entice W766, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 102,4 MB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Helio Fin's processor is just as good as the Motorola Entice W766 one, both have a 0-Core CPU.

The Samsung Helio Fin captures a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Entice W766, because it has a back-facing camera with way more MP. Motorola Entice W766 counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Helio Fin, because it has 940mAh of battery capacity instead of 800mAh.

The Samsung Helio Fin and the Motorola Entice W766 cost exactly the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.