Compare phones
Motorola ES400
ES400, ES400S| Global Score | |
| 45.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3 | -- |
| 2010-06-17 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.08 x 2.38 x 0.67 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 489.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 480 x 640 pixels (VGA) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7627 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.93 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.17 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is much better than the Motorola ES400's 45.5 score. The Google Pixel 4 XL body is newer and much thinner than Motorola ES400's, although it is heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola ES400, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels, much more pixels per inch in the display and a way bigger display.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a lot better hardware performance than Motorola ES400, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4 XL takes much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola ES400, because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola ES400, although it has no slot for an SD memory card. Google Pixel 4 XL has a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola ES400, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 4 XL is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.