Compare phones
Motorola ES400
ES400, ES400S| Global Score | |
| 45.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2010-06-17 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.08 x 2.38 x 0.67 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 489.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 480 x 640 pixels (VGA) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7627 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.93 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.17 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is way better than the Motorola ES400, getting a global score of 90.8 against 45.5. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE design is notably newer and thinner, but somewhat heavier than Motorola ES400. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE works with Android 11 operating system, and Motorola ES400 comes with Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3 operating system.
The Galaxy S20 FE features an extremely better processor than Motorola ES400, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more CPU cores and 5,75 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola ES400, because it has a lot greater display pixels density, a really larger display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a very superior camera than Motorola ES400, because it has a camera with a lot higher 12 mega-pixels resolution. The Galaxy S20 FE has a much bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola ES400, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola ES400, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE costs a little more than Motorola ES400, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.