Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 44.7 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 2.3 | Android 4.0 |
| 2011-07-11 | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.59 x 2.28 x 0.53 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 143 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm MSM7227-1 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Single-Core 600 MHz processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 6.84 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (24 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.61 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.3 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1420mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 3.2 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket is a lot better than Motorola FIRE, with a 71.5 score against 44.7. The Galaxy S III Cricket is a heavier but a lot thinner device than the Motorola FIRE. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy S III Cricket has 4.0 version while Motorola FIRE has Android 2.3 version, providing some extra features and performance tweaks.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a much better hardware performance than Motorola FIRE, because it has an extra graphics co-processor, more cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a much better looking display than Motorola FIRE, because it has a really bigger display, way more pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket takes way better videos and photos than Motorola FIRE, because it has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a much higher 1920x1080 video resolution. Galaxy S III Cricket features a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola FIRE, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 64 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a much better battery duration than Motorola FIRE, because it has 2100mAh of battery capacity instead of 1420mAh.
The Galaxy S III Cricket costs exactly the same than Motorola FIRE, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.