Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 34.5 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.0 |
| 2010-07-30 | 0000-00-00 |
| 3.70 x 2.40 x 0.51 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 3.70 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 220 x 176 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 128 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.76 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 0.1 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 950mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 430 hours standby time 5.3 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket has a global score of 71.5, which is much better than Motorola GRASP's score of 34.5. Galaxy S III Cricket's design is thinner but much heavier than Motorola GRASP. Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a way better display than Motorola GRASP, because it has way more pixels per inch of display, a lot larger display and a way higher resolution of 1280 x 720px.
Galaxy S III Cricket features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola GRASP, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 64 GB. The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola GRASP, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a graphics co-processor.
Galaxy S III Cricket shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola GRASP, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera. The Galaxy S III Cricket has a much longer battery performance than Motorola GRASP, because it has a 121 percent larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket and the Motorola GRASP cost exactly the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.