Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.536.8
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
2010-07-302009-08-06
3.70 x 2.40 x 0.51 inches3.90 x 2.37 x 0.59 inches
3.70 ounces3.50 ounces
$ 100.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2.6 inches
220 x 176 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
128 pixels per inch154 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.55.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
microSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.760
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
4.514.73
CDMACDMA
0.10.1
Battery Life
950mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
430 hours standby time
5.3 hours talk time
6 hours talk time
2.482.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1Bluetooth 2.0
GPSGPS

Comparison review

Samsung Reclaim is slightly better than Motorola GRASP, with a global score of 36.8 against 34.5. Samsung Reclaim's design is a little bit lighter than Motorola GRASP, although it is somewhat thicker and was released only 12 months before. The Samsung Reclaim's processing unit is very similar to the CPU in Motorola GRASP, they have a 0-Core CPU.

Samsung Reclaim features a little bit better screen than Motorola GRASP, because it has a little higher pixel count in each inch in the screen, a higher resolution of 240 x 320px and a larger screen. The Samsung Reclaim features just a bit better camera than Motorola GRASP, because it has a camera with a lot better resolution.

Motorola GRASP counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Reclaim. The Samsung Reclaim counts with a little better battery lifetime than Motorola GRASP, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity instead of 950mAh.

Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Reclaim is also cheaper than the Motorola GRASP.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.