Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.3 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-06-03 |
| 4.80 x 1.90 x 1.00 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 5.14 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 110.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 96 x 64 pixels | 96 x 68 pixels |
| -- | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| -- | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 70 hours standby time 2.8 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.4 |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 1600 has a score of 26, which is just a bit better than Motorola i205's 24.3 global score. Nokia 1600's construction is way thinner and much lighter than the Motorola i205. The Nokia 1600 has a lot better screen than Motorola i205, because it has a quite better 68 x 96px resolution. Nokia 1600 counts with as much storage capacity for apps and games as Motorola i205.
The Nokia 1600's processor is just as good as Motorola i205's processing unit, they have the same number of cores. Nokia 1600's camera is just as good as the Motorola i205 one. Nokia 1600 has improved battery performance than Motorola i205, because it has a 900mAh battery capacity.
Nokia 1600 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.