Search


Compare phones

Global Score
24.639
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
--Symbian 9.4
--2010-08-24
4.79 x 1.94 x 1.04 inches4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches
4.59 ounces3.77 ounces
--Blue, Gray, Purple, Red and White
$ 60.00$ 59.00
Display / Screen
--2.8 inches
130 x 130 pixels 360 x 640 pixels
TFTTFT
--262 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
37.2
processorARM11 (Single-Core 434 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.48
Storage
--52,22 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
01.4
Camera
--2.00 MP
--640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution
05.28
--EDGE and GSM
--SIM
00.3
Battery Life
750mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
75 hours standby time
2.8 hours talk time
450 hours standby time
7.7 hours talk time
2.162.56
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPS--
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Nokia 5250 has a general score of 39, which is a lot better than Motorola i265's overall score of 24.6. Nokia 5250 is a noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Motorola i265. Nokia 5250 features a superior performance than Motorola i265, because it has more CPU cores. The Nokia 5250 features an incredibly better looking display than Motorola i265, because it has a lot higher 640 x 360 resolution.

The Nokia 5250 features a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola i265, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 16 GB. The Nokia 5250 captures way better pictures and videos than Motorola i265. Nokia 5250 counts with longer battery duration than Motorola i265, because it has a 33 percent greater battery size.

Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Nokia 5250 is also cheaper than the Motorola i265.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.