Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 29 | 31.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-11-04 |
| 4.94 x 1.90 x 0.53 inches | 4.21 x 1.81 x 0.54 inches |
| 2.97 ounces | 3.17 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.5 inches | 1.8 inches |
| 130 x 130 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 123 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32,77 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| -- | 128 x 96 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 0 | 3.74 |
| -- | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 880mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 80 hours standby time 4.1 hours talk time | 540 hours standby time 4.8 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.64 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 2330 classic is just a bit better than the Motorola i290, with a global score of 31.8 against 29. Despite being the best in this review, the Nokia 2330 classic construction is a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Motorola i290. Motorola i290 and Nokia 2330 classic feature very similar processing units, both have 0 cores.
Motorola i290 has a slightly better looking screen than Nokia 2330 classic, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse 130 x 130 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density. The Nokia 2330 classic has a way better camera than Motorola i290. The Nokia 2330 classic has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola i290.
The Nokia 2330 classic features longer battery performance than Motorola i290, because it has 1020mAh of battery capacity.
The Nokia 2330 classic costs the same than the Motorola i290.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.