Search


Compare phones

Global Score
29.339
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
--Symbian 9.4
--2010-08-24
4.63 x 1.89 x 0.59 inches4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches
2.96 ounces3.77 ounces
--Blue, Gray, Purple, Red and White
$ 60.00$ 59.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches2.8 inches
128 x 160 pixels 360 x 640 pixels
TFTTFT
114 pixels per inch262 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
5.37.2
processorARM11 (Single-Core 434 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.48
Storage
20,48 MB internal memory52,22 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
0.31.4
Camera
--2.00 MP
--640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution
05.28
--EDGE and GSM
--SIM
00.3
Battery Life
930mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
144 hours standby time
2.9 hours talk time
450 hours standby time
7.7 hours talk time
2.482.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPS--
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Nokia 5250 is a lot better than Motorola i296, getting a global score of 39 against 29.3. Nokia 5250's body is heavier but a little bit thinner than the Motorola i296. Nokia 5250 counts with a lot better display than Motorola i296, because it has a lot more pixels per inch in the screen, a much larger display and a lot better 640 x 360 resolution.

Nokia 5250 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola i296, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 16 GB and 31,74 MB more internal storage. Nokia 5250 features a better performing CPU than Motorola i296, because it has a greater number of cores. The Nokia 5250 has just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola i296, because it has a 1000mAh battery capacity.

Nokia 5250 has a very superior camera than Motorola i296.

Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Nokia 5250 is also cheaper than the Motorola i296, making buying this phone a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.