Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.1 | 27.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 6.1 |
| -- | 2003-10-09 |
| 5.10 x 2.40 x 1.40 inches | 5.10 x 2.24 x 1.00 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| $ 430.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 96 x 64 pixels | 176 x 208 pixels |
| LCD | TFD |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 1,13 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | SD, MMC external memory slot |
| 0.1 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| -- | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1450mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 135 hours standby time 5.2 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 3.2 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3620 is just a bit better than the Motorola i325, with a overall score of 27.5 against 25.1. The Nokia 3620 is a noticeably lighter and a lot thinner phone than the Motorola i325. The Nokia 3620 features a CPU that is just as good as the processor in Motorola i325, both of them have the same number of cores.
The Nokia 3620 has a little more vivid display than Motorola i325, because it has a much higher 208 x 176px resolution. The Nokia 3620 counts with a greater camera than Motorola i325. The Motorola i325 has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Nokia 3620, although it has no external memory slot.
The Motorola i325 features a superior battery life than Nokia 3620, because it has a 71% more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Nokia 3620 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.