Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.1 | 27.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2003-11-12 |
| 5.10 x 2.40 x 1.40 inches | 4.06 x 1.69 x 0.79 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 3.28 ounces |
| $ 430.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 96 x 64 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | LCD |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 2.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 1,13 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.1 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| -- | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1450mAh Li-Ion Battery | 760mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 135 hours standby time 5.2 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 3.2 | 2.16 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Compass |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 5140 is a little bit better than Motorola i325, having a 27.5 score against 25.1. Nokia 5140's body is way lighter and much thinner than the Motorola i325. The Nokia 5140's processing unit is just as good as Motorola i325's processor, they have a 0-Core processor. Nokia 5140 counts with a screen that is just as good as Motorola i325's screen, although the Nokia 5140 also has a lot higher resolution of 128 x 128.
Nokia 5140 counts with a very superior camera than Motorola i325. Motorola i325 has much more memory for apps and games than Nokia 5140. The Motorola i325 features a way better battery duration than Nokia 5140, because it has 1450mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Nokia 5140 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.