Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.1 | 27.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2004-07-20 |
| 5.10 x 2.40 x 1.40 inches | 5.24 x 2.04 x 1.02 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 4.90 ounces |
| $ 430.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 96 x 64 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 2.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 1,13 MB internal memory | 6,14 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| -- | UMTS, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1450mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 135 hours standby time 5.2 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 3.2 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
Nokia 6651 has a global score of 27.5, which is a bit better than Motorola i325's 25.1 score. The Nokia 6651 is a a lot thinner and notably lighter cellphone than Motorola i325. Nokia 6651 counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola i325, because it has a much better resolution of 160 x 128 pixels.
Nokia 6651 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola i325, because it has more internal storage capacity. Motorola i325 and Nokia 6651 have quite similar processors, both have 0 CPU cores. Nokia 6651 counts with a very superior camera than Motorola i325.
Motorola i325 counts with a really longer battery life than Nokia 6651, because it has a 71% larger battery capacity.
Nokia 6651 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.