Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.1 | 27.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.1 |
| -- | 2005-10-12 |
| 5.10 x 2.40 x 1.40 inches | 4.53 x 1.93 x 0.67 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 4.12 ounces |
| $ 430.00 | $ 399.00 |
| 96 x 64 pixels | 352 x 416 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 1,13 MB internal memory | 65,54 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | RS-MMC external memory slot |
| 0.1 | 0.5 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 2.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1450mAh Li-Ion Battery | 970mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 135 hours standby time 5.2 hours talk time | 192 hours standby time 6 hours talk time |
| 3.2 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.2 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
Nokia E60 is a bit better than the Motorola i325, getting a 27.5 score against 25.1. Nokia E60's construction is way thinner and incredibly lighter than Motorola i325. Nokia E60 features a lot better display than Motorola i325, because it has a lot higher resolution of 416 x 352 pixels. Nokia E60 has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Motorola i325, because it has 64,41 MB more internal storage.
Motorola i325 and Nokia E60 feature extremely similar CPUs, both have the same number of cores. The Nokia E60 features a camera that's very similar to the Motorola i325 one. The Motorola i325 counts with a much longer battery duration than Nokia E60, because it has 1450mAh of battery capacity instead of 970mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Nokia E60 is also cheaper than the Motorola i325.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.