Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.4 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| 2008-09-02 | 2005-06-03 |
| 5.30 x 2.10 x 1.20 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 300.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 130 x 130 pixels | 96 x 68 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| -- | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| -- | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 140 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | -- |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 1600 is a little bit better than the Motorola i365, with a 26 score against 24.4. The Nokia 1600 body is notably lighter and notably thinner than the Motorola i365, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Nokia 1600 has a lot better looking display than Motorola i365, although it has a much lower resolution of 68 x 96.
Nokia 1600 has a processing unit that is very similar to Motorola i365's processing unit, both have 0 cores. Nokia 1600 counts with as much storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Motorola i365. The Nokia 1600 features a way better battery life than Motorola i365.
Nokia 1600's camera is just as good as Motorola i365's camera.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Nokia 1600 is also by far the cheapest, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.