| Global Score | |
| 27.6 | 30.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.1 |
| -- | 2006-03-18 |
| -- | 4.44 x 1.71 x 0.61 inches |
| -- | 3.67 ounces |
| $ 460.00 | $ 269.00 |
| -- | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| -- | TFT |
| 141 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 3.1 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 71,68 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.5 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| -- | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 1150mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| FM Radio | -- |
The Nokia E50 is a bit better than Motorola i420, getting a 30.1 score against 27.6. The Nokia E50 and Motorola i420 both count with similar CPUs, both of them have 0 cpu cores. Motorola i420 counts with a much more vibrant display than Nokia E50. Nokia E50 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola i420.
The Nokia E50 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola i420. Nokia E50 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola i420.
Nokia E50 is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.