Compare phones
Nokia 1661
1661, 1662| Global Score | |
| 27.9 | 27.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-11-04 |
| 4.90 x 1.90 x 0.47 inches | 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches |
| 3.90 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 130 x 130 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| 77 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.7 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| -- | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 2.8 hours talk time | 500 hours standby time 3.9 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.32 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola i425 is a little bit better than Nokia 1661, with a 27.9 score against 27.3. The Motorola i425 is a a lot heavier but thinner phone than Nokia 1661. Nokia 1661 features a better screen than Motorola i425, because it has more pixels per display inch and a little bit higher 160 x 128 resolution.
The Nokia 1661's storage capacity to store more apps and games is very similar to Motorola i425's one. The Nokia 1661's processing unit is just as good as Motorola i425's processor, they have a 0-Core processor. The Nokia 1661 has a camera that's very similar to the Motorola i425 one. Nokia 1661 has a bit better battery performance than Motorola i425, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery size.
The Motorola i425 and the Nokia 1661 cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.