Search


Compare phones

Global Score
27.948.9
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
--Symbian Belle
--2011-08-24
4.90 x 1.90 x 0.47 inches4.37 x 2.09 x 0.56 inches
3.90 ounces3.53 ounces
--Black, Green, Pink and White
$ 40.00$ 40.00
Display / Screen
--3.2 inches
130 x 130 pixels 360 x 640 pixels
STNTFT
77 pixels per inch229 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
4.77.5
processorARM11 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor
--512 MB RAM
GPUYes GPU
5.767.38
Storage
--2 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
03.22
Camera
--5.00 MP
--1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution
06.27
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, GPRS and GSM
--SIM
03.3
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1200mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
120 hours standby time
2.8 hours talk time
540 hours standby time
15 hours talk time
2.242.88
Other Features
--Bluetooth 3.0
GPSGPS
--NFC
--Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Nokia 600 is a lot better than the Motorola i425, getting a 48.9 score against 27.9. The Nokia 600 is a a bit lighter but thicker cellphone than the Motorola i425. Nokia 600 has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola i425, because it has a greater number of faster cores. Nokia 600 features a much sharper screen than Motorola i425, because it has a lot greater pixels density and a much better resolution of 640 x 360.

Nokia 600 has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola i425, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 32 GB. Nokia 600 has a way better camera than Motorola i425. The Nokia 600 features a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola i425, because it has a 50 percent larger battery capacity.

The Nokia 600 costs exactly the same than Motorola i425, making it an easy choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.