Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 27.9 | 26.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.1 |
| -- | 2006-09-12 |
| 4.90 x 1.90 x 0.47 inches | 4.60 x 2.74 x 0.55 inches |
| 3.90 ounces | 5.10 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 39.00 |
| 130 x 130 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| STN | TFT |
| 77 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.7 | 3.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 81,92 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | miniSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.5 |
| -- | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 2.8 hours talk time | 336 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
Motorola i425 is just a bit better than Nokia E62, getting a 27.9 score against 26.2. Motorola i425's design is thinner and a lot lighter than the Nokia E62. Motorola i425 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Nokia E62, although it has a way lower resolution of 130 x 130. Motorola i425 and Nokia E62 count with very similar CPUs, both have a 0-Core processing unit.
The Nokia E62 has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola i425. Nokia E62 features a much longer battery duration than Motorola i425, because it has a 1500mAh battery size against 800mAh. Nokia E62 and Motorola i425 feature really similar cameras.
Motorola i425 costs a bit more money than Nokia E62, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.