Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.4 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-06-03 |
| 3.50 x 1.90 x 1.00 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 130.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 130 x 130 pixels | 96 x 68 pixels |
| STN | -- |
| -- | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| -- | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 128 hours standby time 2.8 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.4 |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 1600 has a global score of 26, which is slightly better than Motorola i560's overall score of 24.4. The Nokia 1600 body is much thinner and extremely lighter than the Motorola i560. The Nokia 1600 features a lot better looking screen than Motorola i560, although it has a lot worse resolution of 68 x 96.
Nokia 1600 and Motorola i560 count with very similar CPUs, both of them have the same number of cores. The Nokia 1600's camera is just as good as the Motorola i560 one. The Nokia 1600's storage capacity for apps and games is just as good as Motorola i560's one. The Nokia 1600 features improved battery performance than Motorola i560, because it has 900mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Nokia 1600 is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.