Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 23.9 | 32.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | 2006-04-05 |
| 3.54 x 1.97 x 1.10 inches | 3.36 x 1.89 x 0.90 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 3.27 ounces |
| $ 35.00 | $ 35.00 |
| -- | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| -- | 165 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 5.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| -- | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 75 hours standby time 2.8 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 6 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.56 |
Comparison review
LG CG225 has a general score of 32.2, which is a lot better than Motorola i60c's global score of 23.9. LG CG225 is a extremely lighter and thinner phone than the Motorola i60c. LG CG225 has a way better screen than Motorola i60c. The Motorola i60c and the LG CG225 have similar storage capacity for apps and games.
The LG CG225 and Motorola i60c both have similar processing units, both of them have 0 CPU cores. LG CG225 features greater battery performance than Motorola i60c, because it has a 33 percent more battery size. LG CG225 captures much better videos and photos than Motorola i60c.
LG CG225 costs the same than Motorola i60c.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.