Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 29.4 | 31.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Verizon |
| 2005-10-31 | 2010-10-04 |
| 3.46 x 1.91 x 1.04 inches | 4.30 x 2.10 x 0.80 inches |
| 4.50 ounces | 4.60 ounces |
| $ 200.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.2 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 182 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 6.1 |
| processor | processor |
| -- | 192 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.32 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 3.20 MP |
| 4.51 | 5.06 |
| -- | EV-DO A and CDMA |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 1140mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 70 hours standby time 2.8 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 4.8 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Compass |
Comparison review
Verizon Wireless Casio G'zOne Ravine has an overall score of 31.7, which is a bit better than Motorola i870's 29.4 general score. Although the Verizon Wireless Casio G'zOne Ravine is a little heavier than the Motorola i870, it's incredibly thinner and also newer. The Verizon Wireless Casio G'zOne Ravine counts with a CPU that's just as good as the CPU in Motorola i870, both have a 0-Core CPU.
Verizon Wireless Casio G'zOne Ravine has an incredibly better looking display than Motorola i870, because it has a higher 320 x 240 resolution. Verizon Wireless Casio G'zOne Ravine has a much better camera than Motorola i870, because it has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera. The Verizon Wireless Casio G'zOne Ravine features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola i870.
The Verizon Wireless Casio G'zOne Ravine features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola i870.
The Verizon Wireless Casio G'zOne Ravine not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.