Search


Compare phones

Global Score
35.939
Basic Information
MotorolaBlackberry
--BlackBerry 5.0.x
2009-06-232010-04-26
3.46 x 2.52 x 0.70 inches4.41 x 2.44 x 0.55 inches
4.97 ounces4.80 ounces
$ 179.00$ 110.00
Display / Screen
2.5 inches2.4 inches
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)480 x 360 pixels
TFTTFT
160 pixels per inch250 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.96.6
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
102,4 MB internal memory524,29 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
0.62.42
Camera
2.00 MP3.20 MP
4.735.17
Networks
--Wi-Fi
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA
SIMSIM
0.93.7
Battery Life
1170mAh Li-Ion Battery1400mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
366 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
312 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.83.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 2.1
GPSGPS
--Light Sensor

Comparison review

BlackBerry Bold 9650 is a little bit better than the Motorola Karma QA1, having a general score of 39 against 35.9. The BlackBerry Bold 9650 is a newer cellphone, and it is also notably thinner and just a bit lighter than Motorola Karma QA1. BlackBerry Bold 9650 counts with a better display than Motorola Karma QA1, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher screen pixel density and a way higher resolution of 360 x 480.

The BlackBerry Bold 9650's processing unit is very similar to Motorola Karma QA1's processing unit, both have the same number of cores. The BlackBerry Bold 9650 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has a way more mega pixels back camera. The BlackBerry Bold 9650 has a much greater memory for applications and games than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has 524,29 MB internal storage.

BlackBerry Bold 9650 counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has a 1400mAh battery capacity.

BlackBerry Bold 9650 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.