Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2009-06-23 | 2019-05-07 |
| 3.46 x 2.52 x 0.70 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 160 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 102,4 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1170mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 366 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is much better than the Motorola Karma QA1's 35.9 global score. Although the Google Pixel 3a is a little heavier than Motorola Karma QA1, it's way thinner and incredibly newer. The Google Pixel 3a has a much sharper screen than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2220, a lot higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a much larger display.
Google Pixel 3a has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Karma QA1, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 63,9 GB more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 3a counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has a greater number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3a features a much better battery duration than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3a features a very superior camera than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The Google Pixel 3a costs a little more than Motorola Karma QA1, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.