Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2009-06-23 | 2015-03-01 |
| 3.46 x 2.52 x 0.70 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | S-LCD 3 |
| 160 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| -- | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 102,4 MB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.6 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 4.73 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1170mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 366 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 2.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a lot better than the Motorola Karma QA1, with a global score of 77.7 against 35.9. The HTC One M9 is a extremely newer and a lot thinner phone than Motorola Karma QA1, although it is somewhat heavier. HTC One M9 counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has a higher number of cores, an extra GPU and a 64-bits processing unit.
The HTC One M9 features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has a way better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, way more pixels per inch in the screen and a much bigger screen. The HTC One M9 counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity.
HTC One M9 counts with a much better camera than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has a lot more mega pixels back camera. The HTC One M9 features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has 2840mAh of battery capacity.
HTC One M9 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.