Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.9 | 38.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.3 |
| 2009-06-23 | 2008-02-11 |
| 3.46 x 2.52 x 0.70 inches | 4.25 x 1.85 x 0.59 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 3.17 ounces |
| $ 179.00 | $ 95.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.5 inches | 2.2 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 160 pixels per inch | 182 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.9 | 6.5 |
| processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor |
| -- | 128 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 102,4 MB internal memory | 122,88 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| -- | 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 4.73 | 6.05 |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1170mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 366 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.8 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
Nokia 6220 classic has an overall score of 38.9, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Karma QA1's 35.9 general score. Nokia 6220 classic's construction is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Karma QA1, even though it was released around a year before. The Nokia 6220 classic has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has more processing cores.
Nokia 6220 classic counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Karma QA1, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 320 x 240px, the Nokia 6220 classic also counts with a just a little greater pixels count in each inch in the display. Nokia 6220 classic takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Nokia 6220 classic and Motorola Karma QA1 both have extremely similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, because although the Nokia 6220 classic has no external SD slot, it also counts with 20,48 MB more internal memory. Motorola Karma QA1 has better battery performance than Nokia 6220 classic, because it has a 30% more battery capacity.
The Nokia 6220 classic is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.