Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.437.6
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
2006-07-252010-11-29
4.05 x 1.65 x 0.62 inches4.59 x 2.11 x 0.59 inches
3.60 ounces3.81 ounces
--Black
$ 199.00$ 100.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
128 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.65.8
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
12,29 MB internal memory102,4 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
0.21.6
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
4.734.73
EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.30.1
Battery Life
700mAh Li-Ion Battery1140mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
350 hours standby time
6.5 hours talk time
288 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.082.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS

Comparison review

Samsung Profile has an overall score of 37.6, which is a bit better than Motorola KRZR K1's global score of 34.4. Samsung Profile is a way newer and a little thinner phone than the Motorola KRZR K1, but it is a little bit heavier. Samsung Profile features a bit better looking display than Motorola KRZR K1, because it has a higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 320 x 240 resolution.

The Samsung Profile has a CPU that's just as good as Motorola KRZR K1's processor, they have the same number of cores. Samsung Profile features a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola KRZR K1, because it has more internal storage. Samsung Profile counts with a camera that is very similar to the Motorola KRZR K1 one, both of them have a 2 mega pixels resolution back camera.

Samsung Profile counts with a way better battery performance than Motorola KRZR K1, because it has 1140mAh of battery capacity.

Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Samsung Profile is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.