Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.437.6
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
2006-07-252010-05-10
4.05 x 1.73 x 0.66 inches4.12 x 2.08 x 0.58 inches
3.60 ounces3.85 ounces
$ 200.00$ 160.00
Display / Screen
--2.6 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
157 pixels per inch154 pixels per inch
No touch screenYes
5.85.6
processor processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
18,43 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
0.31.32
Camera
1.30 MP1.30 MP
220 x 176 video resolution--
4.514.51
CDMACDMA
0.10.1
Battery Life
880mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
440 hours standby time
4.2 hours talk time
5.8 hours talk time
2.42.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.1Bluetooth 2.1
GPS--

Comparison review

Samsung Seek is just a bit better than the Motorola KRZR K1m, getting a 37.6 score against 34.4. The Samsung Seek design is a lot newer and somewhat thinner, but also a little heavier than the Motorola KRZR K1m. The Motorola KRZR K1m and the Samsung Seek have really similar processors, both of them have the same number of cores.

Motorola KRZR K1m counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Seek, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 220 x 176px, it also counts with a quite higher screen density. Samsung Seek counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola KRZR K1m.

The Samsung Seek's camera is just as good as the Motorola KRZR K1m one, both have a camera with a 1.3 MP resolution. Samsung Seek counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola KRZR K1m, because it has a 1000mAh battery size.

Samsung Seek not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.