Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3638.7
Basic Information
MotorolaLG
--2008-10-13
4.06 x 1.66 x 0.64 inches4.11 x 2.13 x 0.66 inches
3.88 ounces4.59 ounces
$ 125.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
2 inches3 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
200 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive
6.35.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
51,2 MB internal memory61,44 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.40.5
Camera
2.00 MP5.00 MP
--720 x 480 video resolution
4.735.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.93.3
Battery Life
910mAh Li-Ion Battery950mAh Li-Polymer Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
338 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
400 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
2.42.48
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
--Accelerometer
--FM Radio

Comparison review

LG PRADA II has a general score of 38.7, which is just a bit better than Motorola KRZR K3's 36 overall score. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the LG PRADA II is a a little bit thicker and heavier cellphone than the Motorola KRZR K3. LG PRADA II has a processor that's very similar to Motorola KRZR K3's processor, they have a 0-Core processor.

Motorola KRZR K3 features a little bit better looking display than LG PRADA II, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 320 x 240 and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per display inch. The LG PRADA II has a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola KRZR K3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 61,44 MB internal memory.

The LG PRADA II has just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola KRZR K3, because it has a 950mAh battery capacity against 910mAh. LG PRADA II shoots much better photographs and videos than Motorola KRZR K3, because it has a back camera with way more mega-pixels.

LG PRADA II is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.