Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3639.4
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
--Symbian 9.4
--2009-08-25
4.06 x 1.66 x 0.64 inches4.37 x 2.04 x 0.61 inches
3.88 ounces4.06 ounces
$ 125.00$ 110.00
Display / Screen
2 inches3.2 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)360 x 640 pixels
TFTTFT
200 pixels per inch229 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
6.36.9
processorARM11 (Single-Core 434 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.48
Storage
51,2 MB internal memory71,68 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
0.41.5
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
--640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.735.28
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS and GSM
SIMSIM
0.90.7
Battery Life
910mAh Li-Ion Battery1320mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
338 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
438 hours standby time
7 hours talk time
2.43.04
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0
--GPS
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Nokia 5230 is a bit better than Motorola KRZR K3, getting a 39.4 score against 36. Nokia 5230 is a a little thinner but a little bit heavier phone than the Motorola KRZR K3. The Nokia 5230 has a quite better performance than Motorola KRZR K3, because it has a greater number of faster cores. The Nokia 5230 features just a bit better looking display than Motorola KRZR K3, because it has a way higher 640 x 360 resolution, a little bit higher pixel density and a way larger screen.

Nokia 5230 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola KRZR K3, because it has 20,48 MB more internal memory. Nokia 5230 features a very superior battery duration than Motorola KRZR K3, because it has a 1320mAh battery capacity. Nokia 5230 counts with a better camera than Motorola KRZR K3. Both of them have a 2 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.

The Nokia 5230 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.