Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.4 | 58.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 2.2 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2010-09-01 | 2018-08-10 |
| 4.58 x 2.38 x 0.54 inches | 6.05 x 3.06 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 229.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 265 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP3630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX530 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 7.47 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 5.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.27 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 2.1 has a general score of 58.4, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Milestone 2's 53.4 score. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but Nokia 2.1 has newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Milestone 2 has Android 2.2 version, so it provides a couple additional features and increased performance. Even though the Nokia 2.1 is just a little heavier than the Motorola Milestone 2, it's noticeably thinner and also notably newer.
Nokia 2.1 has a superior processing unit than Motorola Milestone 2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with 512 MB more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. The Motorola Milestone 2 has a more vivid display than Nokia 2.1, although it has a lot smaller display, a little less pixels per inch of display and a lot worse 854 x 480px resolution.
Nokia 2.1 features a better camera than Motorola Milestone 2, because it has a lot higher video resolution and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels. The Nokia 2.1 counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Milestone 2, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Nokia 2.1 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB.
Nokia 2.1 has a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola Milestone 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 1400mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Nokia 2.1 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.