Compare phones
Motorola Moto E (2015)
XT1511XT1511
| Global Score | |
| 63.4 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 5.1 |
| 2015-02-25 | 2015-10-27 |
| 5.11 x 2.63 x 0.48 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 140.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2390mAh Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a global score of 74.8, which is much better than Moto E (2015)'s 63.4 score. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has 5.1 version while Moto E (2015) has Android 5.0 version, giving some extra features and some performance improvements. Motorola DROID Turbo 2's body is way thinner but somewhat heavier than Moto E (2015), and both of them were released with only 8 months difference.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a lot better looking screen than Moto E (2015), because it has much more pixels per inch in the display, a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a larger screen. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than Moto E (2015), because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto E (2015) counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores (although they are slower), a 64 bits processing unit and an additional graphics processing unit. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a greater camera than Motorola Moto E (2015), because it has a much higher video quality, a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a really longer battery duration than Moto E (2015), because it has a 3760mAh battery size instead of 2390mAh.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the Motorola Moto E (2015), which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.