Compare phones
Motorola Moto E (2015)
XT1524XT1524
| Global Score | |
| 63.5 | 68.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-02-25 | 2018-07-09 |
| 5.11 x 2.63 x 0.48 inches | 5.62 x 2.76 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 140.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 245 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-T720 MP1 GPU |
| 9 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 8.04 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2390mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.32 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3 has a global score of 68.7, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto E (2015)'s 63.5 score. The Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3 body is way newer and incredibly thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Motorola Moto E (2015). These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3 has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Moto E (2015) has Android 5.0 version.
Moto E (2015) counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3, although it has a just a bit worse pixel quantity per inch of display, a way lower 960 x 540 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3 has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Moto E (2015), because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB and 8 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Moto E (2015) counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Moto E (2015) also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bits CPU. The Galaxy Amp Prime 3 counts with a bit superior battery performance than Moto E (2015), because it has a 9% larger battery size.
Galaxy Amp Prime 3 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto E (2015), because it has a way better video resolution, a camera in the back with a way higher 8 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better photos in low light situations.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy Amp Prime 3 is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.